Open Letter to Thomas Richards: Spiritually Smart or Intellectually Stupid?

Thomas,

How are you?  I hope well!

I just saw the below message from you which his reply to a post from a viewer in Melbourne, Australia:

—–
tlthe5th (1 month ago) Yes, I read through some of it. Some of it’s highlights. It’s trash. And i mean it. i was so happy to see that actually. What sources he used were very weak and most of it wasn’t sourced at all. The man is a total Vatican shill as well.
—–

For your reference, this was from this YouTube page.

I am writing this to you because a friend of mine in the United States just sent me this exchange between you and the viewer that concerned me directly.  I saw the link from her and at first I thought that I would just leave it but then I listened to your diatribe about “lying” in the beginning of this video.  As such I feel compelled to reply.

I am the author of the book in question, “Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness: The Truth about the Vatican and the Birth of Islam”, and after reading your comments I have to say that I really do not believe that you have actually even seen my book.  I personally think that you are lying.  I wrote a reply to the post which I hope will be posted.

Where do I start?

Besides calling the book “trash”, which I could be taken as a qualitative opinion on any aspect of the book (cover, artwork, writing style, etc.), I have problems with a few of your assertions.  You are free to call the book trash if you want.  I certainly don’t share this view but everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

What set off alarms in my head was when you said that my sources “were very weak” and “most of it wasn’t sourced at all.”  You went on to say that I am “a total Vatican shill as well.”

First of all, I spent two years on the research of this book and there are multiple sources on almost every page.  I am very adamant that the sources are open and in order.  I hereby request you to point out exactly which sources were weak.  I ask you in the process to point out exactly what segments of the book were not sourced at all.  I think the onus is on you here due to your unwarranted comments though I seriously doubt that you will take up the challenge.  Case in point, in your own video you don’t source your own assertions about Leo Ryan, the CIA, Jim Jones, Gary Metz, etc.

As for me being a “Vatican shill”, I am not a Catholic, have never been a Catholic and on top of that I am highly critical of the Pope and the Catholic Church on almost all of their positions.  I was raised in an Evangelical church.  My book had nothing to do with defending the Catholic Church at all.  It was solely about taking all of Alberto Rivera’s claims regarding the Vatican and the birth of Islam and looking at them one by one and examining them for the historical truth.  If you have indeed seen the book, which I doubt, you will note that include Rivera’s entire testimony word by word broken down by chapter.  In fact the opening of every one of my chapters that discusses Rivera’s testimony in the book are Alberto Rivera’s own words, as published by Jack Chick, laid out for examination by the entire world.

Personally I do not believe from reading your comments about my book that you have even been in the same room with my book.  (If so can you tell me where you saw this book?)  I recommend that you have a look at the book yourself.  Once you have actually seen and examined the book (and hopefully you will even read it as well!), compare it to your comments.  I think then you will see who is a bullshit artist and who has done their homework.

Best regards,

Gary Dale Cearley

This open letter is directed to Thomas Richards.

If you found this post interesting and would like to receive updates by e-mail then click here to register to receive my new posts!

Advertisements
104 comments
  1. Bernie Hoffman said:

    Dear Mr. Cearley,
    I have not read your book, nor am I familiar with your views, so I cannot address them. I am, however, familiar with Mr. Richards and his views. You are correct when you call him intellectually stupid. He has aligned himself with a group called Tony Alamo Christian Ministries. He has lived with this group and follows their doctrines and speaks about their leader, Tony Alamo, in his videos. This group follows the practices of child raping, child beatings and polygamy. I would concur that someone who believes in these most heinous sins against our children is not just intellectually stupid, but something much more sinister.
    Please go to: http://www.tonyalamonews.com for more information.
    Thank you for your time.

    • Dee said:

      Sounds like a forum for boot licking papists to me.

      • Amazing that you would think so. I can’t find one single comment on this post that is in support of the papacy. You must have a sixth sense about things. Lucky you!

    • Greg said:

      WRONG, you dont listen to thomas. after finding out the truth about the zionist almao, he retracted everything he said about him and he is redoing his site. Alamo had a lot of people fooled so dont get on peoples case. You didnt know till it made news headline.

    • Thomas said:

      Talk about having a platform for “False Accusers” and false accusations to be slung by anonymous individuals at people such as myself!! GDC is a channel for false accusations. I hadn’t been part of Alamo Ministries for 5 years when this was all going down and I didn’t believe the accusations. This was before Alamo was brought to trial where real witnesses were brought in to testify against Alamo. For people to come on here and accuse me in the vile manner which you have enabled is simply disgusting. As soon as I began reading in the paper the testimony of the witnesses and Alamo’s defense in court I knew he was guilty and I publicly renounced him. Yet for some reason you had so much hate in yourself to go after me with several blatantly false accusations. Was that all because of the comment I made on a youtube video GDC? REALLY? I highly doubt that. You have one of two things motivating you. Hate or something else. But I know you had a motive to try and discredit me. And it wasn’t the little comment I made about you in the comment section of a youtube video. Well you’ve done you work right DGC? By accusing someone of guilt before it was actually proven? Let’s see. Who like to make people guilty until proven innocent? How about the roman catholic inquisitions? How about socialism and communism? I waited until the opposite before I opened my mouth. I considered Alamo innocent until PROVEN guilty. Which is something I’m actually proud of. Because i did it even in the face of the most outrageous accusations that you see here in your forum this day! You call yourself an American? Or some kind of patriot? Well, you have exposed yourself as the opposite. You have shown you despise due process. And so have others on this forum. Maybe that’s why you left this county aye? Well good GDC because you don’t belong here!!

      • I’m not anonymous Richard.

        Why was your YT channel not accessible for many months?

        Why was your website not accessible for many months?

        Why has your website now changed?

        What are your views on Ted Gunderson?

        What are your views on Fritz Springmeier?

        What is happening to Kent M. Wiedemann in this video?

      • I should add that Dcvid Icke is a gatekeeper. His major disinformation is regarding reptilian shape-shifters. This is to throw people off the trail of the systematic abuse of children that happens at all level.

      • Thomas,

        By blocking me from your YT channel and not even challenging me here make me suspicious of you.

        If you are just a Christian with some conspiracy theory about Jesuits and Alex Jones, then I could understand but your way of hiding makes me question how you are part of a darker, complex and more hidden conspiracy.

      • I don’t need a motive to discredit you, Thomas. You do it every time you open your mouth. The fact that you have taken down all the portions of your website I have linked to as well as the video of your idol, Alberto Rivera, big lying fraud that he was, is proof enough that you are sweeping your tracks.

        By the way, you also took down the post on your site that said, just about the time that Alamo got his just desserts, that you had only now switched to believe that he wasn’t who you thought he was. If you don’t stop lying you will make it to Hell (for those who believe in it).

  2. Okay, it starts to make sense now. I became aware of Tony Alamo many years ago. Anyone who would listen to him is a fertile field for Jack Chick and Alberto Rivera.

    • Stephen said:

      Greetings, Mr. Cearly. Before I go anywhere, I oughta say that I haven’t read your book, although perhaps I should. I’m only sixteen, but I have quite a few things going – writing a book for fun, composing, reading conspiracy theories, chilling with friends – I’m quite a character. I’ve read through most (if not all) of the Alberto comic books, and to say the least, they are very interesting reads. However, interesting is all they are; God only knows whether Alberto is really right and the Roman Church somehow managed to cover up every single scrap of evidence about their connection to the birth of Islam and rewrite the history, but until there’s proof for this, then obviously the one who “has the law on his side” is the one who’s read the history books and done his homework – i.e., you. Now, like I said, I haven’t read your book, but I can already point out a suspicious bit in ‘The Prophet’. Alberto says that the Vatican created Islam to destroy rival Christian churches and the Jews. Now, my grandfather is an avid fan of history, and in one of his books, he wrote how early non-Catholic churches were actually SHELTERED by Islam from the Catholic Church. Indeed, Southern Spain was a region where Jews, Muslims, and Christians peacefully coexisted for many years. It was only later when Islam became the dangerous, intolerant entity, and even then not all individual Muslims are haters like we make them out to be. I like Alberto’s stories (and I’m even incorporating some of his and Eric Phelps’ conspiracy theories into the story I’m working on to add some spice to the action), but until some guy sneaks into a Vatican vault and finds a document tying the Vatican to Islam’s beginning, then like I said, “the law is on your side”. Best regards, Stephen.

      • Thomas said:

        Stephen said, ” Now, my grandfather is an avid fan of history, and in one of his books, he wrote how early non-Catholic churches were actually SHELTERED by Islam from the Catholic Church.”

        That sounds like the famous claim of the Catholic Church when they state they protected Jews during the holocaust. Let’s just say there may have been very few cases of that but that doesn’t make up for the 6 million who died because of the Catholic cult. But the claim sure sounds good on paper don’t it?? Oh and btw, your grandfather being an avid reseracher of history and he said such and such isn’t very convincing to me either! I’m wondering if you were actually the ghost writer for Cearley’s book. He makes all kind sof similar claims throughout it. That’s why I said I thought it wss trash by the FEW PAGES I read of it.

  3. Gary said:

    I find it hard to believe that there is any kind of abuse going on at Alamo Ministries. in this day and age all it takes is one call to CPS and they have to come investigate. And they are a Gestapo type agency. They would have come in like they did the FLDS. Your allegations are also unfounded. They are only “allegations”. no one has been found guilty of these allegations and in this country we are innocent until proven guilty.

    • Otto said:

      Heh. Hindsight is 20/20 and all that, but still it is amusing to see this sort of comment after Tony Alamo got 175 years in prison for child-rape.

      • Alamo is what he always was. And he is where he deserves and needs to be!

  4. Recently i was confronted by a man I consider to be a Jesuit Coadjutor and a Vatican Shill.

    https://thoushaltnotbearfalsewitness.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/open-letter-to-thomas-richards-spiritually-smart-or-intellectually-stupid

    He was confronting me over my comments to a book he wrote refuting Alberto Rivera’s info tying the Papacy to Islam. Why would someone who professes to be a baptist (Clinton claimed to be a Baptist also) take it upon himself to vindicate both the Papacy and Islam all the while attempting to DEBUNK Alberto Rivera?

    Right there should have any serious Vatican researcher VERY suspicious. When I began reading excerpts of his book I found a lot of these types of wordings. “it was known to be” or “it is well known that…” as if this verifies his info.

    While reading these types of things i couldn’t help to think that this mans book is TRASH. I don’t consider Alberto infallible. i am open to anything and if i saw enough evidence to show Alberto is a fraud i would never promote his work and i would completely disassociate myself from him.

    But this has not happened. over and over again i see his words verified. Can alberto misspeak? can he get a fact wrong? yes he can. I lived an a USS NAVY vessel and knew like the back of my hand it’s exact dimensions and the exact manning. if I tried to tell you the exact dimensions today i may get some of it wrong. Does that mean i wasn’t on the ship? NO! Does it mean I wasn’t in the NAVY? NO!

    So, recently I began to look again at this man who is publicly calling me out and here’s what I found right away.

    I just began looking a little bit into the Gary Cearly who confronted me on his blog in regards to alberto’s testimony. just to show you a taste of what this man is all about, he interviews a scholar of islam and similiar things, the scholar is a professor in Israel at the university of bethlehem.

    here is the school:
    http://www.bethlehem.edu/about/history.shtml

    “Bethlehem University of the Holy Land is a Catholic Christian co-educational institution of higher learning founded in 1973…”

    you can begin reading that and see what this guy is a bout and where he gets his sources. THIS WAS THE FIRST THING I FOUND IN RESEARCHING THE GUY! what will i find next? i dont know if i need to continue.

    here is the man he interviewed.
    https://thoushaltnotbearfalsewitness.wordpress.com/category/jack-chick

    i began reading this and saw that the professor has a slanted version of history. first of all the jews who left egypt with moses didnt study judaism as this guy suggests. they followed only the law of Moses. “Judaism” is a much newer religion which i believe started around and/or after the time of Christ. i would have to look at that to get the exact details but thats why i said what i said about Cearly. when i started looking at things he was saying way back when i saw that he was washed up.

    Take care, Thomas

    Not to mention the other links i have included in this thread

    http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mind_II/index.php?showtopic=2329

    along with Dr. Veith’s incredible lecture entitled “The Islamic connection”

    I would say that this Cearley who has challenged me has found himself buried under a mountain of evidence tying Islam to the papacy that he would NEVER be able to dig himself out of.

    Thomas Richards

    • Thomas,

      First of all, again, as you make the assertion that your comments were not released because I somehow don’t want to be faced with “mountains of evidence” to the contrary of what I state then it shows your implicit dishonesty again. You know very well that this was withheld because you withheld approval for my comment on your YouTube account. (Will you now approve that comment? I doubt it.)

      I stand firm in calling you a liar that you have never even read the book. One of the very first bits of information in the book describes my religious background which is neither Baptist as you say I purport to be, nor Catholic, which I am fairly sure would be your next assertion. And the only part of my book which you can reference is an appendix which I posted to the internet. All that does is to show that you are a callous liar. I don’t mind criticism of the book but I do resent liars who throw stones in glass houses.

      Your analogy about serving on a naval vessel did not fit your subject. In Alberto Rivera’s case it is doubtful he was even on a ship yet he comes back and describes a UFO! You have to look into his story. It is bunk! And in your criticism above you go on to talk about Walter J. Veith’s lecture but this lecture is taken almost lock stock and smoking barrel from Robert Moray and Alberto Rivera. Veith even uses Chick Publication illustrations in many frames. This wasn’t “research” this man did. It was disseminating disinformation. Much of what he has said was covered already in my book and I have found it to be not true in the least. Yet you wouldn’t not that. You’ve never even cracked the cover yet you claim that “most” of my book isn’t sourced at all. Not only is that not true but you should keep in mind ALL of Alberto’s testimony IS NOT SOURCED.

      Now, You have your response here on my blog. Are YOU going to approve my response on YouTube?

      • Can we please move on from of this religious nonsense. Facts:

        1. Some Elites have DID (Dissociative Identity Disorder). Some alternative identities are psychotic.

        2. There is much evidence to show that the CIA created people to be DID since they make the prefect spy.

        3. Children are ritually and sexually abused (or sacrificed) in christian churches and cults or Satanic churches and cults.

        4. Many elites for in society are involved in satanism or the occult. This has gone on for Centuries if not Millenniums.

        6 There is a lot connecting Freemasonry, Nazis, Bohemian Grove, New World Order, Bilderburg Group, CIA abuses, 9/11, 7/7, Genocide, Globalism, Internationalism, War on Terror. Henry Kissinger, George Bush, The Rockefellers, The Rothschilds, Zionism.

        7. Exorcism or Deliverance is performed by Christians to supposedly rid people of demons. The same Christians see that someone with DID are demonically possessed.

        8. DID is the most misunderstood mental disorder. DID is the most hidden mental disorder.

        I would like to be better able to care for my wife but there are so many opinionated people in this world with their “conspiracy theories” who are sheep. I am of no religion and I am not religious. My own opinion is that Christians and Satanists are part of the same two headed beast. Dualistic in nature like Left and Right in Politics.

        I fully support a world wide investigation into the claims of Ted L Gunderson and Gene “Chip” Tatum.

  5. John Cooper said:

    What is written by that person “Bernie” is nothing but evil lies and is LIBEL and should be taken DOWN.

    The CHURCH he is referring to does NOT “practice” those vile things but is a born again christian church.

    people should go there yourselves before listening to some random phony who is even using tony alamo’s birth name to post a comment in here.

    there has ONLY been “allegations” made against Alamo Ministries. Not ONE drop of hard proof.

  6. John Cooper said:

    It’s AMAZING how STUPID people really are to just run with accusations made by unknown persons. Persons who haven’t been cross examined by a DEFENSE. This illegal conduct made by people who are SWORN to uphold law should be exposed for what it is. NAZISM.

    “Allegations” are NOTHING. The NEW law is saying that people are GUILTY until proven innocent. Total inquisitional tactics. You can not face your accuser. You are guilty until proven innocent. Allegations are presented before a judge and they give permission to people to take your children and break into your house.

    Anyone who approves of this is Anti American and Anti Christ.

  7. John Cooper said:

    And John Gary, you should be ashamed of yourself. you srutinize accusations made by Alberto rivera and others about the vatican and then some halfwit stops by your page throwing around filth and slander and you say,

    “Okay, it starts to make sense now. I became aware of Tony Alamo many years ago. Anyone who would listen to him is a fertile field for Jack Chick and Alberto Rivera.”

    YOU are a PHONY

    • Nope. Nothing phony. Would you mind revising your remarks in light of the recent events?

  8. Sandra Hope said:

    Mr. Cearley,
    I am surprised by the comments made by “John Cooper” especially because Mr. Alamo/Hoffman has been arrested, incarcerated and remains in jail without bail, and will be brought to trial in February for his crimes against children.
    While one can do a google search to inform oneself, the website mentioned above, http://www.tonyalamonews.com does a great job putting all of the information in one spot.

  9. John Cooper said:

    Two Fake names and yet spammed the same link (“Bernie Hoffman” -1st response above and now “Sandra Hope”). Obviously the same person. And I’m sure the web site address you spammed is as phoney as YOU.

  10. Fio said:

    Thomas Richards is a Satanist Zionist posing as a Protestant Christian. He is nothing but a coward and he doesn’t have the intelligence or the manhood to debate anyone a typical coward like Eric Jon Phelps. ITS NOT THE JESUITS ITS THE JEWISH BANKERS!

  11. Bren said:

    Thomas Ricards is a hateful person. Ignorant!!!

  12. Honestly Thomas Richards is teaching works salvation and if it’s true that he’s a Zionist, that explains why he exposes the Vatican yet he doesn’t teach the right plan of salvation like the SDA and JWs.

  13. andrew b said:

    ok im confused, wat is this site about

  14. Thomas Richards in my opinion is someone who doesn’t care what the truth is unless it matches what he wants it to be.

  15. John Currier said:

    Another case of trusting man not god. God is the only source of truth. All the rest is meaningless.

  16. If this is a blog about how wrong Thomas Richards’ is, why do you have the link to his YouTube channel on this page under “top clicks?”

  17. well just wanna say why do you take a man website down if he is telling the lie. let the people decide with their own conclusion and self concious. If He was telling the truth. why do you take down his website? Remember this You can’t stop truth. and the Truth shall set you free.

  18. Alexander said:

    How many people actually believe in Thomas Richards’ lies? I wonder, is Thomas still smoking weed like he once did? Thomas, if your reading this, you really need to research your history, as well as see a therapist. Bigots like you always seem to citing bible verses to try and prove your point about the church being the “mother of harlots”, while at the same time ignoring previous chapters and the original languages. I’m going to try and take apart some of what you assert. So let’s begin.
    You claim Alex Jones, who is a bigot as well, is a CIA-agent and Jesuit. Uh, how do you know this? Jones himself is an anti-catholic because he claimed 19th century catholic immigrants were part of some papal plot to take over America. You seem to believe in the lies of Eric Jon Phelps, a guy you seem to support. Why would you support a racist and white-supremacist who has called for the genocide of all Catholics?
    You also claim that Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Bavarian Illuminati, was a Jesuit. Wrong. He was educated by Jesuits and developed a hatred of the order. He eventually became an atheist. See Terry Melanson’s article “Sniffing out Jesuits”. You’ll probably lable him as a Jesuit or Jesuit-coadjutor as well. Also see “Eric Jon Phelps Exposed, Part 1”.
    If I recall correctly, in the video link that is on this article (before Thomas removed the video), he claimed some pastor by the name of Kilpatrick was a jesuit. How do you know this? Oh, that’s right you don’t have proof.You also claimed the Pope told bush to invade Iraq. Are you really that stupid? I guess you don’t realize the Pope condemned the Iraq war. And please show evidence that Gary Metz is Catholic. But I guess anybody who debunks Alberto Rivera’s lies is automatically a catholic or a jesuit, right?
    On Hitler. You claim he was a catholic, which is true. But if look at histroy, you’ll find he left the church and persecuted both jews and catholics. Please explain the 3,000,000 dead catholics during the holocaust. This would include jesuits. And please see ptwf.org to discover the truth about the church during the war. But apparently it seem’s you believe Gary Krupp is also part of a conspiracy. You are far from being “christ-minded”. And to any anti-catholic protestant reading this who thinks the reformation was so “holy”, see David Armstong’s “The Protestant Inquistion.” Also google the jesuit oath debunked. As Gary Allen said in the 1970’s, bigots are the true disinformers who “because of racial or religious bigotry, they will take small fragments of legitimate evidence and expand them into a conclusion that will support their particular prejudice, i.e., the conspiracy is totally “Jewish,” “Catholic,” or “Masonic”. These people do not help to expose the conspiracy, but, sadly play into the hands of those who want the public to believe that all conspiratorialists are screwballs.”—None Dare Call It Conspiracy
    Mr.Cearley, I sincerely apologize if this was too long. Also, Youtube says his channel isn’t available anymore, but yet his videos can still be found on youtube. I guess he made it private for those who worship him. And great book by the way.

  19. Alexander said:

    Disinfo? Apparently I’m disinfo because I put out the facts? If anybody is disinfo, it’s Thomas. Why? Because he tries to attach every conspiracy theory as having Jesuit connections. Paranoia at it’s best. Sorry that I actually use my brain when I’m doing my research. Unlike Thomas and others, I don’t go around labeling people as CIA agents, Jesuits, Zionists, Illuminati, Freemasons, etc. But I do lable some people as bigots or paranoid, and for good reasons. It’s strange how anybody who puts out REAL facts is labled as disinfo or anything else mentioned. The anti-catholics are stuck in their world of a Jesuit-only lie. They believe in the lies of Eric Jon Phelps, Alberto Rivera, Thomas Richards, the forgery known as the Jesuit oath, and many other things. Did you even read any of the articles I mentioned? I doubt it. Next time think before you post a random statement full of nonsense. It’s pathetic.

    • Michael Tsarion and David Icke are disinformation. David Icke due to his claim of reptilian shape-shifters and Michael Tsarion due to him giving the below talk and not mentioning anything about the mental disorder, Dissociate Identity Disorder (DID) in which alters (young or old) can present and the body is not hypnotized. Think about it, Michael Tsarion must surely be aware that David Icke has written about DID quoting the work of Fritz Springmeier (disinformation ???).

    • alan said:

      let me tell you some facts not theorys the rothschilds are all knights of malta the cia was was created by william donovan a knight of malta look you guys you call anyone a zionist disinfo cause there theory deosnt agree with yours so they must be a zionist disinfo cause what there saying deosnt agree with my zionist theory grow up guys for gods sake tell you what research the knights of malta a catholic knighthood order and you will soon change your tune. the jesuit do actually control the new world order and if you really done your homework guys you would know this but you wont you just falsey accuse thomas do me a favour will you spend just one week looking into the knights of malta seriously and you will be shocked to find that they control world banking and the media military and the intelligence networks you spend your time looking for at a non excisting nat while swollowing a pharisee camel ive been strong in what ive said but you guys are out of order slandering the guy without actuall evidence just theorys and everyone has them like armpits and some of them stink like you guys ive have to speak the truth on this page your not truth seekers your false pharisee accusers

      • Here is something for you Alan (whoever you are).

        http://truth-terror.org/texe-marrs.htm

        Make sure you have JavaScript enabled or you will be redirected to Facebook. Why would I be interested in Texe Marrs.

        http://www.eaec.org/expose/FritzSpringmeier1.htm

        THE LETTER FROM MRS. GAIL SPRINGMEIER

        Written to Texe Marrs, Director
        Power of Prophecy Ministry
        1708 Patterson Road, Austin, Texas 78733

        I not necessary calling Thomas Richards’ a disinformation agent. I just find it suspicious that for a period of time last year, his YouTube channel was unavailable even though his YT videos were available.

        Look on the Facebook profile of Texe Marrs that I have mirrored on my domain. What do I see. It seems that Texe Marrs is in the Facebook group ‘PAZ ~The Party of Anti-Zionists’.

        Think about it, you write:

        “you guys you call anyone a zionist disinfo cause there theory deosnt agree with yours so they must be a zionist disinfo cause what there saying deosnt agree with my zionist theory grow up guy”

        Texe Marrs is an anti-Zionist which hints at a Zionist conspiracy and here you are saying that I am wrong. Where in this commentary prior to this comment do I even mention Zionism. It is interesting that I can connect Texe Marrs via certain avenues to Ken O’Keefe.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_O%27Keefe

        Where does Ken O’Keefe currently reside? Gaza. I know way more than you think and I have plenty of evidence to prove many things.

      • Here is something for you Alan (whoever you are).

        http://truth-terror.org/texe-marrs.htm

        Make sure you have JavaScript enabled or you will be redirected to Facebook. Why would I be interested in Texe Marrs.

        http://www.eaec.org/expose/FritzSpringmeier1.htm

        THE LETTER FROM MRS. GAIL SPRINGMEIER

        Written to Texe Marrs, Director
        Power of Prophecy Ministry
        1708 Patterson Road, Austin, Texas 78733

        I not necessary calling Thomas Richards’ a disinformation agent. I just find it suspicious that for a period of time last year, his YouTube channel was unavailable even though his YT videos were available.

        Look on the Facebook profile of Texe Marrs that I have mirrored on my domain. What do I see? It seems that Texe Marrs is in the Facebook group ‘PAZ ~The Party of Anti-Zionists’.

        Think about it, you write:

        “you guys you call anyone a zionist disinfo cause there theory deosnt agree with yours so they must be a zionist disinfo cause what there saying deosnt agree with my zionist theory grow up guy”

        Texe Marrs is an anti-Zionist which hints at a Zionist conspiracy and here you are saying that I am wrong. Where in this commentary prior to this comment do I even mention Zionism. It is interesting that I can connect Texe Marrs via certain avenues to Ken O’Keefe.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_O%27Keefe

        Where does Ken O’Keefe currently reside? Gaza. I know way more than you think and I have plenty of evidence to prove many things.

      • Sorry Gary for the duplicate comment.

        BTW, I know Ken O’Keefe was somehow involved with Egyptians during the early parts of the recent Egyptian revolution. I believe that he is working against the Palestinians even though he seems to support the Palestinian cause. Whatever we face is not just a X, Y or Z conspiracy. This is multifaceted conspiracy with many deceiving heads.

  20. Psycho Exposer said:

    Alan Gresley :Thomas,
    By blocking me from your YT channel and not even challenging me here make me suspicious of you.
    If you are just a Christian with some conspiracy theory about Jesuits and Alex Jones, then I could understand but your way of hiding makes me question how you are part of a darker, complex and more hidden conspiracy.

    Is this you Alan Gresley? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSKoh95Wwqo

    Pretty scary. I bet you’re used to being blocked. A quick google search on your name actually shows that. Does the “angry aussie” exchange ring a bell?

  21. Thomas said:

    Gary Dale Cearley :I don’t need a motive to discredit you, Thomas. You do it every time you open your mouth. The fact that you have taken down all the portions of your website I have linked to as well as the video of your idol, Alberto Rivera, big lying fraud that he was, is proof enough that you are sweeping your tracks.
    By the way, you also took down the post on your site that said, just about the time that Alamo got his just desserts, that you had only now switched to believe that he wasn’t who you thought he was. If you don’t stop lying you will make it to Hell (for those who believe in it).

    Gary, I can put up and take down whatever i want to. I go by what i believe to be true at any given time. If I find that i am wrong about something of course i will take it down. This false and crazy accusation from you bewilders me. Should I keep up information supporting Alamo? That is just illogical and I’m really trying to understand why you would say this. And Alberto isn’t an idol of mine. You are a false accuser for saying that. You’re just angry because i prove him to be more authentic than you prove him to be a fraud. According you you, no one should be “ex members” of any organization. Is that corerct? Are you judging me and falsely accusing me that i didn’t have a sincere change of heart? Gary, you are a very evil man. that’s all i have to say about you. You truly make me sick. i’m sure that will make your day so have a good one!

  22. @Thomas,

    My comment to you has the time “February 4, 2011 at 12:57 pm.”

    Then on my YT channel,

    http://www.youtube.com/user/smokeandmirrors67

    is this comment, “you are the definition of a cyber stalker” and after an hour this YT channel is closed. Are my questions to hard to answer?

  23. Thomas said:

    http://welcometobawdville.com/category/drunken-stories/ Gary I can see by your newest “work” that you are simply a drunk. I can also tell by your writings that the toxic alcohol has severely affected your brain. I also realize you are just an internet troll. And yes, you have attached yourself to the Vatican whether you like it or not. I’m sure they love you for your drunken rants here. Have they offered to make you a knight yet? Don’t forget the verse in the Bible about drunkards Gary. “Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.” 1 Cor 6:10 So according to this verse Paul states you are a false witness. Because James says, “For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.” James 2:10 So this proves YOU ARE THE FALSE WITNESS GARY

    Gary Dale Cearley :I don’t need a motive to discredit you, Thomas. You do it every time you open your mouth. The fact that you have taken down all the portions of your website I have linked to as well as the video of your idol, Alberto Rivera, big lying fraud that he was, is proof enough that you are sweeping your tracks.
    By the way, you also took down the post on your site that said, just about the time that Alamo got his just desserts, that you had only now switched to believe that he wasn’t who you thought he was. If you don’t stop lying you will make it to Hell (for those who believe in it).

  24. alan said:

    pharisee forum give the guy a break

  25. alan said:

    thomas hits the target on the vatican and and has an excellent website

  26. Rorsharch said:

    t’s official, folks…you can lump Thomas Richards into the same category as Alex Jones, Divid Icke, Jennings, and other disinformation agents. While Richard’s resources concerning the apostasy of Rome are spot on…the same research can be found by men who came long before Richards who do a much better job of explaining everything. Richards is another shill who gained his pseudo-credibility by supposedly exposing Alex Jones. It was a sham to get you to approach his brand of disinfo if Jones failed to pull the wool over you eyes. Ultimately Richards pushes the same propaganda…just from different angles. Both Richards and Jones are pointing people to the same self-destructive conclusions. On a side note, after a brief personal dealing with Richards in which I was blocked from his fb page after he misunderstood one simple comment, I can attest to the fact that he is a slow, paranoid, rude, and total control freak.

  27. Rorsharch said:

    After seeing my post above, Richards, king of ripping others off, paranoid delusions, and narcissism has now just officially declared me a Jesuit (according to “proof” in google) on his fb page because I (along with every other guy in the US with the same name) supposedly share some mysterious link to some old Roman Catholic convent. By this logic, I guess this means that he is synonymous with mental illness considering what pops up when you type his name into google. Anyway, this guy is more bananas than monkey poop.

    • Thomas said:

      Oh whatever man. It’s obvious you were at my fb page to make trouble. Then after I blocked you you freaked out and now you’re slandering me all over the internet. You’re a liar just like the guy who runs this blog “Thou shalt not bare false witness”. What do you have to show for yourself? that you’re an established internet troll. Good for you! Nice forum you chose here to attack me as well. That just shows what you’re all about. Have fun “Joseph Chaney”

      • Rorsharch said:

        No, you took a comment I made about an article as a personal insult, blocked me before I could elaborate on what you misunderstood and the intent of the comment, and then proceeded to talk smack knowing full well that I couldn’t say anything in my defense at that point. What if I had legitimately disagreed with you on something? What would your response have been then? You are a paranoid ass and I meant every word that I just said in the message I just sent to your youtube inbox. The accusation you leveled at me could get me killed and I take that pretty damn personally. Renig and issue a formal apology or face the consequences. I will have people find as much dirt on you as possible and expose it to the world in every fashion at my disposal to destroy what little image and credibility you have left. It is wonder that you or anyone else takes you serious after your involvement with Tony Alamo though.

      • Alamo boy calling someone a liar? That’s super rich! But then again, what more could one expect from an Alberto Rivera and Jack Chick boot licker?

  28. Thomas said:

    Oh please guy. Who are you? A NOBODY… AND I didn’t misunderstand your comment. It is obvious you’re just a troll. Anyone can do a google search for your youtube user name “CrimsinStar” and see that I’m speaking the truth. You’re saying on here I officially labeled you a Jesuit = LIE again… Go ahead and do what you have to. I blocked you for a reason. And you’ve proven I was right with you’re internet slander afterward. Oh and btw, there have been many good men who thought Alamo was sincere at one point. Alberto Rivera, Bill Cooper, Avro Manhatten, Jack Chick and many others. Alamo church was attacked the first time because of a tax issue. This second set of accusations seemed fake as well. I thought it was just another attack on a real truther.

    Another lie you keep throwing around is I stole research. My work is all original and authentic unless I cite a source. It’s obvious that you don’t care anything about credibilty. You have to chose an already biased forum to try and attack me. You’re a joke. This blog is by a guy who says alberto Rivera was a total fraud so you feel at home here. You probably are a jesuit then.

    • Rorsharch said:

      If I am nobody, what does that make you, Richards? Who are you. Who gave you the authority to judge a man’s worth? I don’t even like Alex Jones, but at least people I know have heard of him before. You…no dice. Sorry, you’re just an angry little child inside trying to validate his existence by getting attention for what he rages against. Alberto Rivera…though a seemingly sweet and well intending man…was revealed as a fraud later too it seems, Richards. I personally don’t see how changing the subject to focus on others excuses your behavior though. Jack Chick has some issues with his theology. It’s obvious that you ripped people off if you research ANY Roman Catholic exposers who came before you, pal. Everything you have to say continues to shine light on you. You are full of nothing but anger, lies, venom, and bile. Remember in a few days or weeks from now that all I asked for was a simple renig of your inflammatory comments, your accusation, and a public apology. End of conversation.

      • Rorsharch said:

        Don’t get me wrong, I liked Rivera and his testimony of the Jesuit mafia was damning, but his own wife said he lied, dude. There are plenty of other resources that haven’t been debukned that you can pine over though. Unquestioningly supporting one guy in spite of evidence to the contrary has already brought your lack of good judgement into question once.

  29. Rorsharch said:

    Thank me, Richards. If any one is actually paying attention to this then it’s the most attention (what you seem to crave most and how you measure the value of others according to a comment you made on my yt channel) you’ve probably gotten from anyone in a few months to a year, lol. I used to think you were brilliant until I looked at little closer at some of the things you were saying and how you treated people and then discovered a man by the name of Walter Veith who presents the same arguments in a much more credible, intelligent, and kinder way. Granted I don’t agree with some facets of SDA theology, but he at least radiates the love of the Lord. All you give off is nastiness and fear-mongering.

  30. Thomas said:

    Please dude. Enough with your lies. You’re like a sensitive homosexual. I banned you and you flipped out. period. now you’re coming up with all these fake reasons to slander me. I’ve been around the block many times with people like yourself. I would have been your best friend if you would have been respectful. I don’t need your approval or anybodies for that matter. i’m not looking for fans. i just put out the truth. YOU came on my fb page “talking smack”. here’s what you said, “Yes, let’s take the Westboro and Obama administration route and demonize all returning vets as potentially unhinged monsters…” That was a comment to an article i posted. i gave you a chance to redeem yourself but instead you used profanity and further insulted me. That is when I banned you. Now you have resorted to this public pathetic display here. Enough is enough. Good bye and good riddance…

    • Rorsharch said:

      I know that was what I said. Again, as I stated in the response that actually LACKED profanity (you are lying, sir), it was in response to my opinion of the article itself not a personal attack against you. If I had wanted to personally attack you I could have done it many other ways. The issues is you that you were wrong about it, are an egotist, deleted the comment, blocked me for no justifiable reason, and proceeded to bash me and call me out knowing full well that I could not respond. You, sir, are a coward and a dick. Plain and simple. End of conversation

  31. Rorsharch said:

    Thank you, Mr. Richards for being civil and deleting your inflammatory comments.

  32. Thomas said:

    I didn’t delete them for your benefit at all. I deleted them because it’s worthless garbage on there. I posted some new comments just for you though…

  33. Rorsharch said:

    I stand corrected with your recent comments you ignorant jackass. I almost mistook you for a human being. The gloves are off now. I stand by my earlier promise.

  34. Rorsharch said:

    Also, Richards, you try to condemn me for exposing Islam yet it is part of the bedrock of your argument against Rome (an institution that I also condemn). Both have the same hellish legacy? Islam just has a higher body count (270 million people over 1400 years) and is more of an overt threat to the nation at the moment. Why condemn me for exposing this? Seems very hypocritical on your part. Seems like you are grasping at straws at this point to try and demonize me.

    • Thomas said:

      Yeah, i see that’s the latest propaganda going around…. meanwhile even if that was true it would be at the direction of the vatican. And now you’ll state that al-Qaeda isnt CIA right? Okay well if the CIA trained OBL and al Qaeda, who trained them over the last 1400 years? thats right, the vatican. Especially seeing the CIA was created by the vatican through one of their Knights. The FBI as well. You’re so easy to expose it’s not funny. What other sock puppet accounts ahve you used in the past “christkeep” “Franklin Li” and many others.. keep it up.. i like doing this kind of research. I’m finding all you comments on the internet and taking screen shots of them. i see what you’re all about.. comical stuff actually…

      • Rorsharch said:

        So what exactly did you expose, lol? We only briefly supported OBL and the Mujahadin at that time because of our interest in keeping Russia from controlling things there. We haven’t been responsible for OBL for nearly two decades and we aren’t responsible for the creation of Alqueda itself. As for your other statements…either way Islam and Rome are both evil and abusive in and of themselves. You agree with this in your own words. So, tell me, lol…what have you proven and exposed, Richards? More of your further ineptitude?

      • Rorsharch said:

        Nobody had to train Muslims to kill and subvert either. Read everything Muhammad the pedophile (now I understand why you defend Islam) had to say after he left Mecca for Medina. Their actions and antisemitism today are the result of Muhammad’s teachings. The Quran is essentially “Mein Kampf” mixed with “An Idiot’s Guide to Slavery, Genocide, and World Domination”. There is nothing peaceful about true grassroots Islam.

  35. Rorsharch said:

    Here is the link to the article (originally referenced by WND) along with the contractor’s pdf file you ignored in the previous statements of mine you dug up and referenced in your latest weak attempt at an insult me on your fb page btw. http://slapblog.com/?p=9736

    • Thomas said:

      I would never click any links you provide. And I would advise any others not to do so as well. This person “Rorsharch” is a bonifide agent.

      • Rorsharch said:

        I wish, lol. I’d love the pay and the work as an FBI field agent personally. Who knows? Considering my current contacts I might just get the opportunity in some minor capacity. It’d be better than wasting my time getting slandered by pissant weasels like you, Richards.

  36. Rorsharch said:

    Funny, you accuse me of being a “troll” because I disagreed with you once, but your actions for the better part of the last few hours on your fb page, your twitter, and here have been the behavior of one if I have ever seen it. Either you get a sick release from making things up continually, a sense of empowerment to your starving ego by belittling them, or you have an undiagnosed mental illness left over from your (supposed) gulf war days. Or as I originally assessed based on your behavior today, you are a satanic dinfo agent just like Jones. I wouldn’t be at all surprised to learn that you, Jones, Rogan, Ventura, and Icke all get together from time to time to drink virgin’s blood, sacrifice a goat, and molest small children for “epic lulz”.

    • Rorsharch said:

      Seriously, is there any way you could make your website and youtube channels look any more like something that came from a satanic webring? Are you sure the color schemes aren’t dark and oppressive enough? Maybe you should throw in a few pentagrams for ambiance.

  37. alan said:

    Rorsharch :
    Don’t get me wrong, I liked Rivera and his testimony of the Jesuit mafia was damning, but his own wife said he lied, dude. There are plenty of other resources that haven’t been debukned that you can pine over though. Unquestioningly supporting one guy in spite of evidence to the contrary has already brought your lack of good judgement into question once.

    so you liked rivera and then found out he was wrong and yet u condemn thomas for following tony.. and finding out he was not all he appeared to be what a total contradiction that is mate.. ur just a slanderer pure and simple look at thomas;s research its based on facts as ive checked them all out..

    • I believe you have the wrong idea. I never liked Rivera. I even wrote a book about his fraudulent claims. Thomas Richards supported Alberto Rivera and Tony Alamo. I am not slandering anyone. Look at Thomas’s own words.

  38. Thomas said:

    Gary Dale Cearley :
    Alamo boy calling someone a liar? That’s super rich! But then again, what more could one expect from an Alberto Rivera and Jack Chick boot licker?

    More slander and lies from a false accuser. That comment belonged in your “drunken tales” section Cearley…

  39. Karmen Nava said:

    Do not even defend yourself Thomas Richards–you have done nothing wrong and you are part of the few defenders of the real faith. Most people, even if they criticize you, do not have the guts to stand up to the most vile religious organization on the face of the earth. Imagine a church who says they represent Jesus the Messiah´s teachings with an army of pedophile priests involved with a multitude of other sexual trafficking activities involving minors. The Bible describes satan as an “angel of light.” This describes the perfect picture of a church who does not represent the beautiful teachings of Jesus the Christ. Just read Matthew 5 alone and you should be convinced that this religious organization who is the leader of many other religions who are joined to her does not represent Jesus´/Yahushua´ss teachings.

    May the Holy One Yahovah bless Thomas Richards and his family! Numbers 6:24-25. The Holy One of the true Israelites those who have received their Messiah and been cleansed from their sins bless you abundantly and give you shalom!

    • Thomas Richards has a better chance of getting the truth when he wipes his ass than when his wipes his mouth.

  40. KatieCaliente said:

    Ive decided that perhaps stupid people deserve to die and burn.
    After all, we are all going to have to answer for ourselves.
    Thomas, its hard work building something on your own, as a member of the Baptists cult, and some weird cult, called, the church of christ–I know first hand how psychologically abusive these cults are.
    dont be discouraged by the spammers and hackers of dreamland!

    who wouldnt follow orders, if disobeying those orders, meant, an eternity in HELL.
    You’ve done a good job exposing what looks like mysterious ties in Waco and Jonestown.
    The truth is, the CIA only knows how to murder—those are typical missions…they just murder everyone when they are finished.
    CIA=not afraid of sloppy seconds
    Ill tell you right!
    a dingo stole my baby
    god help the aliens—

    “lets just kill everyone”

    CIA memo

    just kidding i made that up

    * ive pointed out to Jews that ive never attended a catholic mass, nor received Jesuit instruction–like jesuit coadjutator Bill Murray–famous comedian, his humour is laced with pro-vatican/jesuit oaths and blood libel

    i made that up

    Jews=idiots

    Jesuits=homosexuals/pedophiles/internet addicts/

    • Thomas said:

      “who wouldnt follow orders, if disobeying those orders, meant, an eternity in HELL.”

      I wouldn’t. Thats why I didn’t last at the alamo cult. Additionally, I had no idea Tony Alamo was committing those crimes. I was never around him and his life is a secret to most of the other cult members there. When I saw Alamo’s defense collapse during trial, that is when I realized what was going on. I immediately withdrew from supporting him and his cult. Case closed.

      • Good at closing cases, aren’t we?

  41. Well what dya know. Thomas Richards is famous for deleting comments and banning people.
    Here is his last comment to me just today before he banned me:: “”what is “love” can you answer that scripturally? We are to “love” all according to the commandments of God. Love is the keeping of God’s commandments. I stated that clearly in my post. Additionally, I don’t think you’re up to speed to be able to comment here so I will say goodbye to you.”
    I’m not up to speed. Attacking me, not what I posted.

  42. All I said that according to Scripture The Lord hates certain wicked people and Tom says we should love them.
    Oh well, I’m not up to speed, so……………

  43. Wow, incredible blog layout! How long have you been blogging for?
    you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your web site is
    magnificent, as well as the content!

  44. Watching from the outside said:

    Let’s just say this NWO conspiracy clearly has strong ties to the Vatican and Zionism.. Clearly the Vatican sits at the top with other occults trying to confuse the rest of us.. All organized religions are working against the evolution of humanity and spirituality.. The planet is dying while you’re all too busy fighting over who is right and who is wrong.. The NWO agenda is moving forward while you all try to discredit each other… I for one can see straight through people like David icke and Alex jones and Eric Jon Phelps, we can also see through Charlie sheen and Mel Gibson.. A lot of what Thomas has put on his website is complete conspiracy truth.. Yet a lot of conspiracy theorists don’t like reading facts.. I’ve experienced this first hand with people around me.. The world is waking up and it doesn’t matter how many blogs there are trying to discredit true information.. It’s the dawning of the age of Aquarius 🙂

  45. Hi there! I just wish to offer you a big thumbs up
    for the excellent information you have here on this post.
    I’ll be coming back to your site for more soon.streetdirectory

  46. Hello there, just became alert to your blog through Google,
    and found that it is really informative. I’m going to
    watch out for brussels. I will appreciate if you continue this in future.
    Many people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  47. Doyle said:

    It’s actually a cool and useful piece of info. I’m satisfied
    that you shared this useful info with us. Please stay us up to date like this.
    Thanks for sharing.

  48. Nice blog here! Also your website loads up fast! What host are you using?
    Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my web site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  49. I almost never leave a response, but i did some searching and wound up here Open Letter to Thomas Richards: Spiritually
    Smart or Intellectually Stupid? | Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness.

    And I actually do have a couple of questions for you
    if it’s allright. Could it be simply me or does it seem like
    a few of the remarks appear like written by brain dead individuals?

    😛 And, if you are writing at other online sites, I’d like to follow anything new you have to post.
    Would you make a list of every one of your public sites like your Facebook page,
    twitter feed, or linkedin profile?

  50. After I initially commented I seem to have clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now each time a comment is added I recieve four emails with the
    exact same comment. Perhaps there is an easy method you are able to remove me
    from that service? Many thanks!

  51. I’m impressed, I must say. Seldom do I come
    across a blog that’s both educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you have hit the nail on the head.
    The issue is an issue that too few people are speaking intelligently about.
    I’m very happy that I found this during my hunt
    for something regarding this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: